
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.digwin.com/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>starry - voted: digWin</title>
<link>http://www.digwin.com/forum/user/starry/voted/hot</link>
<description>Microsoft Top news, Buzz &amp; Breaking Stories by communities</description>
<language>en</language>
   <item>
   <title>IOPS calculation</title>
   <link>http://www.digwin.com/iops-calculation</link>
   <description>Hello,

I've recently stumbled upon the disk configuration / IOPS calculation article  (http://www.messagingtalk.org/concepts-in-disk-sizing) and had a question about calculating current usage.  I'm trying to work the numbers for our server and I'm not sure if the results are correct.  Could you please check my math and see if I'm doing this </description>
  </item>
   <item>
   <title>UPSERT in SSIS 2005</title>
   <link>http://www.digwin.com/upsert-in-ssis-2005</link>
   <description>Hi,

I have a scenario where there are duplicate records in source itself. In that case SCD (SSIS 2005) inserts all the records in target without updating.
 
Here is the sample scenario:
 
My Source table structure is like 

ID (Primary Key) , MGR_Id , MGR_NAME , MGR_DOJ  

Values are :

1        1        XXX                                   </description>
  </item>
   <item>
   <title>Windows 2003 Cluster Virtual DNS vs Physical Host Name</title>
   <link>http://www.digwin.com/windows-2003-cluster-virtual-dns-vs-physical-host-name</link>
   <description>Hello,

In our data center we have implemented Active/Passive High Availability using Windows 2003 Cluster. As far cluster setup goes everything looks great and failover works flawlessly. But when the application team is installing Glass Fish Application Server and Tomcat app server, this server's registering the Physical host name instead virtual </description>
  </item>
 </channel></rss>